Linguist 1 90

Linguist 1 90

Linguistic 101
Linguist 1 90 Day
Linguist 1 900
Linguist 130a
This episode features Bryce, who learned conversational Portuguese in just 90 days with the Fluent in 3 Months Challenge. We actually guarantee that anyone who completes the Fluent in 3 Months Challenge will have a 15-minute conversation in their new language after 90 days of learning. You can find out more here. In this episode, Benny.
O-1 (lowest officer grade) starts with a base pay of $3,188.40; E-1 (lowest enlisted grade) starts with a base pay of $1,680.90; Officers who excel in their work have the potential to rise to the best paying job in the military. People in the top ranks, such as Brigadier General or Rear Admiral, earn 6-figure salaries.
The now-classic Metaphors We Live By changed our understanding of metaphor and its role in language and the mind. Metaphor, the authors explain, is a fundamental mechanism of mind, one that allows us to use what we know about our physical and social experience to provide understanding of countless other subjects. Linguist definition, a specialist in linguistics. The estimate of English speech rates most widely known to teachers and researchers in EFL is that provided by Pimsleur et al. However, Pimsleur et al.' S estimate of standard rates of speech was based on one particular variety of English: that of radio news announcers.
Joining the Armed Forces could connect you with a rewarding career. As with most occupations, you'll need to put in a few years to earn higher pay. Military base monthly pay is determined by your rank and years of service.
To qualify for military jobs that pay well, the biggest action that you can take is to pursue a career as an officer. Commissioned officers and warrant officers earn much higher salaries than enlisted personnel.
Compare these monthly salaries taken from the 2019 military pay grades and see the difference.
E-9 (highest enlisted grade) with 10 years experience earns $5,308.20
E-9 (highest enlisted grade) with 30 years experience earns $7474.80
O-10 (highest officer grade) with 20 years experience earns $15,800.10*
W-5 (highest warrant officer grade) with 20 years experience earns $7,812.60
W-5 (highest warrant officer grade) with 40 years experience earns $10,223.40
Nch ​​soundtap 5 00 download free. *Pay scale remains the same for O-10 officers with over 20 years of service.

Becoming a commissioned officer requires joining the military with a college degree. People with higher educations attend Officer Candidate Schools. Alternatively, people can become officers by joining the Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) at a civilian college or university. Both of these routes can lead to the highest-paid military jobs.
Even early in their careers, officers earn far more than enlisted service members.
O-1 (lowest officer grade) starts with a base pay of $3,188.40
E-1 (lowest enlisted grade) starts with a base pay of $1,680.90
Officers who excel in their work have the potential to rise to the best paying job in the military. People in the top ranks, such as Brigadier General or Rear Admiral, earn 6-figure salaries.
Table of Contents
1 Best Paying Military Jobs
Best Paying Military JobsWhen considering a military career, you naturally want to know what is the highest paying job in the military? No single answer works for everyone. Your assessment scores and interests direct your career. Additionally, military priorities determine which specialties get incentive bonuses or special pay. 
As with civilian careers, the top paying military jobs go to those with higher education or specialized skills. Military physicians and surgeons earn salaries over $150,000 a year plus benefits. Military dentists bring in over $180,000 a year plus benefits. Ship and boat captains can expect to make about $150,000 a year plus benefits.
Linguistic 101Opportunities for Enlisted Personnel

Becoming a commissioned officer requires joining the military with a college degree. People with higher educations attend Officer Candidate Schools. Alternatively, people can become officers by joining the Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) at a civilian college or university. Both of these routes can lead to the highest-paid military jobs.
Even early in their careers, officers earn far more than enlisted service members.
O-1 (lowest officer grade) starts with a base pay of $3,188.40
E-1 (lowest enlisted grade) starts with a base pay of $1,680.90
Officers who excel in their work have the potential to rise to the best paying job in the military. People in the top ranks, such as Brigadier General or Rear Admiral, earn 6-figure salaries.
Table of Contents
1 Best Paying Military Jobs
Best Paying Military JobsWhen considering a military career, you naturally want to know what is the highest paying job in the military? No single answer works for everyone. Your assessment scores and interests direct your career. Additionally, military priorities determine which specialties get incentive bonuses or special pay. 
As with civilian careers, the top paying military jobs go to those with higher education or specialized skills. Military physicians and surgeons earn salaries over $150,000 a year plus benefits. Military dentists bring in over $180,000 a year plus benefits. Ship and boat captains can expect to make about $150,000 a year plus benefits.
Linguistic 101Opportunities for Enlisted PersonnelAll branches of the military assess recruits to determine their aptitude for various occupations. Recruits take tests known as the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. ASVAB test scores determine occupational choices for military recruits. Higher test scores qualify people to train for positions that could pay more.
The military uses codes to describe different occupations. The U.S. Army and Marine Corps apply military occupational codes, or MOS, to various jobs. The U.S. Navy uses the term NEC for navy classification codes. For the U.S. Air Force, it's the AFSC for air force specialty code.
Each code describes a specific occupation. Although the military pays everyone according to their rank and years of service, MOS, NEC, or AFSC for demanding positions authorize extra payments. Who gets extra pay is subject to change. Military branches reward occupations that they need the most and these needs could shift over time.
Enlistment BonusesEnlistment bonuses present an immediate opportunity to earn money beyond base pay rates. The military pays substantial sums to people who join with critical skills or who can complete special training.
Positions with high enlistment bonuses:
Linguist 1 90 DaySatellite communications systems operator – $40,000 bonus
Cryptologic linguist – $40,000 bonus
Microwave systems operator – $24,000 bonus
Petroleum supply specialist – $21,000 bonus
Air defense battle management system operator – $18,000 bonus
Human intelligence collector – $18,000 bonus
Cryptologic cyberspace intelligence analyst – $18,000 bonus
RADAR repair technician – $18,000 bonus
Enlistment bonus structures are subject to change.
Special Duty PayBoth enlisted personnel and officers have opportunities to develop their careers and earn higher salaries. Personnel assigned to jobs with duties and responsibilities beyond normal jobs qualify for Special Duty or Hardship Pay. Over 60 types of special or incentive pay have been authorized across the branches of the military.
Examples of Special Duty Pay:
Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay = extra $224 per month
Diving Duty Pay = up to $340 per month for enlisted and up to $240 per month for officers
Flying Duty, Crew Members = extra $110 to $250 per month depending on pay grade
Foreign Language Proficiency Bonus = Up to $12,000 per year
What is the Highest Paying Branch of the Military?Linguist 1 900To seek the highest pay, you don't have to limit yourself to a certain branch of the service. Military jobs pay is consistent across the Air Force, Army, Marines, Navy, and Coast Guard. Differences in pay arise from rank and time in the service.
Civilian Jobs With Matching DutiesMore than 1.3 million people work as active-duty personnel in the Armed Forces. Many of them hope to transition to lucrative civilian careers.
When beginning your military service, research how your military job will match up with civilian work. Find out how to write a resume military to civilian. Your early decisions could lead to lifelong opportunities. 
The following civilian jobs are examples of high-paying jobs where veterans often thrive.
Intelligence Analyst
Pay range: $75,000 to $120,000
Management Consultant
Pay range: $80,000 to $200,000
Logistics Analyst
Pay range: $50,000 to $85,000
Aviation/Aerospace Program Manager
Pay range: $90,000 to $155,000
Pilot
Pay range: $70,000 to $160,000
Plan for Career SuccessLinguist 130aTo qualify for good-paying military jobs, you'll need to be willing to pursue extra training on the job. Ask commanders for opportunities or pay attention to notices that offer special pay for certain duties.
If you need more information read related articles:
Linda R. Bedford
Linda is a Professional Resume Writer and Military to Civilian Transition Specialist. Her expertise range across a large spectrum of industries. She loves coaching with people and helps job-seekers in transitioning to their next and best chapter.
Publications

2010. Minimalist Interfaces: Evidence from Indonesian and Javanese. Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today Series 155. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
-- reviewed by Eugenia Romanova for LinguistList: LI Issue 23.1886
-- reviewed by Michael Yoshitaka Erlewine for Oceanic Linguistics 55(1):298–306.
EDITED BOOKS
In prep. A festshrift. [with Etsuro Shima, Naoto Tomizawa, Yoshiki Ogawa, Yoshihito Dobashi, Cornelia Daniela Lupsa; scheduled to be published in March 2022]. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
2014. The Routledge Handbook of Syntax. London: Routledge. [with Andrew Carnie and Daniel Siddiqi]
-- reviewed by Dennis Ott for LinguistList: LI Issue 25.2041
PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES
In press a. Action/result in Indonesian accomplishment verbs and the agent control hypothesis. Oceanic Linguistics.
In press b. Syntactic head movement in Japanese: Evidence from verb-echo answers and negative scope reversal. Linguistic Inquiry [with Masako Maeda]
2020. Idioms, argument ellipsis and LF-copy.Journal of East Asian Linguistics 29:259-278.
2019a. Comparative syntax of argument ellipsis in languages without agreement: A case study with Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Linguistics 55:643–669.
2019b. Particle stranding ellipsis involves PF-deletion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37:357–388. [with Masako Maeda]
2018a. On the in-situ theory of sluicing in English: A new perspective from 'immobile' elements. English Linguistics 35:97–122. [with Nobu Goto and Shin-Ichi Kitada]
2018b. String-vacuous head movement in Japanese: New evidence from verb-echo answers. Syntax 21: 72–90. [with Shintaro Hayashi]
2017. Wh-questions in Singapore English tell us what about questions with declarative syntax? Glossa 2:1–18. [with Jian Gang Ngui]
2016a. Remarks on the parameters of argument ellipsis: A new perspective from Colloquial Singapore English. Syntax 19:392–411.
2016b . Subject-object asymmetries in Persian argument ellipsis and the anti-agreement theory. Glossa 1:1–31. [with Simin Karimi]
2016c. Prosodic phrasing and the that-trace effect. Linguistic Inquiry 47:333–349. [Yoshihito Dobashi]
2015. Argument ellipsis in Javanese and voice agreement. Studia Linguistica 69:58–85.
2014. Argument ellipsis in Colloquial Singapore English and the anti-agreement hypothesis. Journal of Linguistics 50:365–401.
2013a. Fragments, ellipsis, and PF-repair: New evidence from Indonesian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 58:497–505.
2013b. Cyclic spell-out and modal complement ellipsis in Javanese. Linguistic Analysis 38:183–206.
2013c. More on kena-passives in Singapore English and the distribution of passive morphemes. World Englishes 32:297–307. [with Chonghyuck Kim]
2013d. Wh-questions in Colloquial Singapore English: Adaptive traits from Vernacular Malay and typological congruence. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 28: 299–322.
2012a. Multiple spell-out and contraction at the syntax-phonology interface. Syntax 15:287–314.
2012b. Particle-stranding ellipsis in Japanese, phase theory and the privilege of the root. Linguistic Inquiry 43:495–504.
2012c. Radical pro drop and the role of syntactic agreement in Colloquial Singapore English. Lingua 122:858–873. [with Chonghyuck Kim]
2012d. Successive cyclicity at the syntax-morphology interface: Evidence from Standard Indonesian and Kendal Javanese. Studia Linguistica 66:32–57.
2012e. On the argument structure of zi-verbs in Japanese: Reply to Tsujimura and Aikawa (1999). Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21:197–218. [with Maki Kishida]
2012f. Got interrogatives and answers in Colloquial Singapore English: Akitionsart and stativity. World Englishes 31:186–195. [with Mie Hiramoto]
2011a. P-stranding under sluicing and repair by ellipsis: Why is Indonesian (not) special? Journal of East Asian Linguistics 20:339–382.
2011b. Radical pro drop and fusional pronominal morphology in Colloquial Singapore English: Reply to Neeleman and Szendröi. Linguistic Inquiry 42:356–365.
2011c. On the movement theory of obligatory control: Voices from Standard Indonesian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 56:267–275.
2010a. One-replacement and the label-less theory of adjuncts. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 55: 416–423.
2010b. Complex phrase structures within morphological words: Evidence from English and Indonesian. Lingua 120:379–407.
2009a. Psychological predicates and the point-of-view hyperprojection. Gengo Kenkyu135:123– 150. [with Maki Kishida].
2009b. Reduplication asymmetries in Bahasa Indonesia and the organization of the lexicon-syntax interface. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1:189–204.
2007. Remarks on the derivational vs. representational theories of grammar: A multiple spell-out account of one- and do so-substitution. Explorations in English Linguistics 20:29–62.
2003. Semantic regularity in the alternation in idioms. English Linguistics 20:419–440.
2002. A dynamic semantic account of causative psych verb constructions. Explorations in English Linguistics 17:83–117.
PEER-REVIEWED SHORTER ARTICLES
2010a. Complementizer deletion in Kansai Japanese revisited: A prosodic account. Snippets 22
2010b. Evidence for the bimorphemic analysis of everything from relative clauses. Snippets 21
2010c. Nominative case without tense in the Niigata dialect of Japanese. Snippets 21
2008. Case-stranding nominal ellipsis in Japanese: A preliminary sketch. Snippets 17
2007. P-stranding generalization and Bahasa Indonesia: A myth? Snippets 16 
PEER-REVIEWED BOOK CHAPTERS
To appear a. Polarity reversals in Japanese sluicing and Neg raising. In Etsuro Shimah, Naoto Tomizawa, Yoshiki Ogawa, Yoshihito Dobash, Cornelia Daniela Lupsa and Yosuke Sato (eds.), Festschrift for Professor Yoshiaki Kaneko (tentative title), XXX-XXX. Tokyo: Kaitakusha. 
To appear b. On the degree semantics of hutsuni and zenzen. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 28. In: XXXX, XXX-XXX. Stanford, CA: CSLI.[with Yuka Imai and Moka Michihata] 
2020. How to eat yourcake and have it too in Japanese: Causal pluralism and the role of agentivity. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 27. In: MichaelBarrie (ed.), 209–223. Stanford, CA: CSLI. 
2018. Particle stranding ellipsis in Japanese, string deletion, and argument ellipsis. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 25. In: Shin Fukuda, Mary Shin Kim and Mee-Jeong Park (ed.), 159–172. Stanford, CA: CSLI. [with Masako Maeda]
2014. Scrambling. In: Andrew Carnie, Daniel Siddiqi and Yosuke Sato (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Syntax. 264–282. London: Routledge. [with Nobu Goto]
2012. Phonological interpretation by phase: Sentential stress, domain encapsulation and edge sensitivity. In: Ángel Gallego (ed.) Phases: Developing the Framework. 283–307. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2009. Spelling-out prosodic domains: A multiple spell-out account. In: Kleanthes Grohmann (ed.) Interphases: Phase-Theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces. 234–259. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2008. The distribution of the active voice morphology in Bahasa Indonesia and vP phases. In: Yoshiaki Kaneko, Akira Kikuchi, Daiko Takahashi, Yoshiki Ogawa, and Etsuro Shima (eds.) The State of the Art in Linguistic Research: Interface of Form and Meaning. 365–376. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
WORKING PAPERS/CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS
2020a. Focus mismatch under ellipsis in Japanese, polarity and head movement. Proceedingsof the 22nd Seoul International Conferenceon Generative Grammar, ed. by Tae Sik Kim and Sae-Youn Cho, 224-232. Seoul: The Korean Generative Grammar Circle. 
2020b. How can one killsomeone twice in Indonesian? Causal pluralism at the syntax-semanticsinterface. Proceedings of the 94th AnnualMeeting of the Linguistic Society of America 29–43. Washington, DC:Linguistic Society of America. 
2019a. How can one killsomeone twice in Indonesian? Proceedings ofthe 12th Generative Linguistics in the Old World & the 21st Seoul International Conferenceon Generative Grammar, ed. by Sae-Youn Cho, 537–545. Seoul: The Korean Generative Grammar Circle. 
2019b. Lexical decompositionin syntax: New evidence from VP-ellipsis. Proceedingsof the 12th Generative Linguistics in the Old World & the 21st Seoul International Conferenceon Generative Grammar, ed. by Sae-Youn Cho, 210–222. Seoul: The Korean Generative Grammar Circle. [withJianrong Yu] 
2018. Spelling-out inverse scope in Japanese: Intonation and scope-prosody correspondence. Phonological Externalization 3. ed. by Hisao Tokizaki. 25-53. Sapporo: Sapporo University. [with Masako Maeda]
2017. Particle stranding ellipsis in Japanese involves PF-ellipsis. Proceedings of the 19th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar: The Syntax-Morphology Interface in Generative Grammar. 171–190. [with Masako Maeda]
2016a. An in-situ syntax of sluicing in Indonesian. AFLA 23: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association. 243-257. Canberra, Australia: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.
2016b. How large can elliptical arguments be in Japanese? Proceedings of FAJL8: Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 79: 121–130. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy: MITWPL.
2015. Sluicing in Bahasa Indonesia, P-stranding, and interface repair. Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 269-280. University of California, Berkeley: Department of Linguistics.
2013. Reduplication in Indonesian and the lexicalist hypothesis. Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 365-372. University of California, Berkeley: Department of Linguistics [with Bradley McDonnell]
2012. Phase-bound locality, deletion, and failure of vocabulary insertion at the syntax-phonology interface. Proceedings of the Forty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the ChicagoLinguistic Society, 159-169. University of Chicago: Department of Linguistics. [with Dwi Hesti Yuliani].
2011. P-stranding under sluicing in Indonesian, repair by ellipsis and the organization of grammar. Proceedings of GLOW in Asia VIII 2010: Universals and variation, 326-329. Beijing Language and Culture University: Beijing.
2010. Coordination, dependency, and gapping in Japanese. Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL6): MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 61, 309-324. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy: MITWPL.
2009a. Gapping in Japanese = Coordinate + dependent ellipsis. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on East Asian Linguistics: Simon Fraser University Working Papers in Linguistics 2. Simon Fraser University: SFU Linguistics Graduate Student Association.
2009b. Radical underspecification, general number, and nominal mapping in Indonesian. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association. 197-209. Department of Linguistics: University of California, Santa Cruz.
2008a. Japanese obligatory control as switch reference: An AGREE-based account. Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 56. 267-278. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy: MITWPL
2008b. The distribution of the active voice morphology in Javanese and vP phases. Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics 18. 235-246. University of California, San Diego: Department of Linguistics.
2008c. The denotation and morphosyntax of bare nouns in Javanese: Against the nominal mapping parameter. Proceedings of the 2007 Mid-America Linguistics Conference: Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 30. 257-271.University of Kansas: Linguistic Graduate Student Association.
2008d. Wh-in-situ in Bahasa Indonesia and choice function. Proceedings of the 2007 Mid-America Linguistics Conference: Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 30. 272-286. University of Kansas: Linguistic Graduate Student Association [with Dwi Hesti Yuliani]
2007a. A new type of nominal ellipsis in Japanese. Proceedings of the Fourth Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 55: 197-204. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy: MITWPL [with Jason Ginsburg]
2007b. The syntax of intrinsic reflexivity in Japanese: A case study with zi-verbs. Proceedings of the 9th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar: Locality and Minimalism. 391-404. [with Maki Kishida].
2006. A new type of nominal ellipsis in Japanese: Further evidence for the LF copy analysis. Proceedings of the 8th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar:
Minimalist Views on Language Design. 61-77. [with Jason Ginsburg]
2005. One- and do so-replacement revisited: An argument for the derivational approach to syntax. Proceedings of the 2005 KASELL International Conference. 90-100.
2003a. Causative psych verbs as world-creating perceptive predicates: A hyperclause analysis of backward binding. The Handbook of the 127th National Conference of the Linguistic Society of Japan. 128-134.
2003b. Idiom compositions and lexical decompositions. JELS 20: Papers from the Twentieth National Conference of the English Linguistic Society of Japan. 258-259.
BOOK REVIEWS
2014a. Review of Shiobara, Kayono (2010) 'Derivational linearization at the syntax-phonology interface,' Hituji Syobo, Tokyo, for English Linguistics 31: 325-338.
2014b Review of Moro, Andrea (2012) 'The Equilibrium of Human Syntax: Symmetries in the Brain', Routledge, London, for LINGUIST LIST 25.309.
2013. Review of Uribe-Etxebarrie and Valmala Vidal (eds.) (2012) 'Ways of structure building,' Oxford University Press, Oxford, LINGUISTLIST Issue 24.1454
2012a. Review of Low, Ee-Ling and Hashim Azirah (eds.) (2012) 'English in Southeast Asia:Features, policy and language in use,' John Benjamins, Amsterdam, LINGUIST LIST Issue Number 23. 3907.
2012b. Review of Randall, Janet (2010) 'Linking: The Geometry of Argument Structure,' Springer. Studies in English Literature 53: 171-182.
2011a. Review of Richards, Norvin (2009) ‘Uttering Trees,' MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 56: 286-289.
2011b. Review of Lebeaux, David (2009) 'Where Does Binding Theory Apply?' MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. LINGUIST LIST Issue Number 22. 551
2010. Review of Grohmann, Kleanthes K. (2009) 'Explorations of Phase Theory:Interpretation at the Interfaces,' Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. LINGUIST LIST Issue Number 21. 1718.
2009a. Review of Reinhart, Tanya (2006) 'Interface Strategies: Optimal and Costly Computations,' MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 54:574-577.
2009b. Review of Aarts, Bas (2008) 'English Syntax and Argumentation, Third Edition,' Palgrave Macmillan, New York. LINGUIST LIST Issue Number 20. 1457.
TEACHING-RELATED PUBLICATIONS
2010a. ELG 365 Morphology: Study Guide. SIM University. [Approximately pp. 90; distributed at the Department of English Language and Literature at SIM University in July 2010]
2010b. ELG 367 Syntax: Study Guide. SIM University. [Approximately pp. 90; distributed at the Department of English Language and Literature at SIM University in July 2010]
PAPERS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW/TO BE SUBMITTED SOON FOR JOURNALS
2021a. Moving forward: The past and future of spatiotemporal metaphors in Javanese. Ms., Seisen University/YUAI International Islamic School. [to be submitted to Journal of Cognition and Culture; co-authored with Dwi Hesti Yuliani] 
2021b. Crossed-control in Indonesian and voice incorporation. Ms., Seisen University. [to be submitted to Natural Language & Linguistic Theory] 
2021c. Transfer domains in Japanese and relativized vP phases: Reply to Saito. Ms., Seisen University/Niigata University. [under the second round of reviews at English Linguistics, co-authored with Shin-Ichi Kitada]
2021d. Reversed polarity sluicing in Japanese and neg raising. Ms., Seisen University. [under the first round of reviews at Glossa] 
2021e. Do we really know where to stop? Labeling, criterial freezing, and partial wh-movement in Indonesian. Ms., Seisen University. [under the second round of reviews at Syntax]
2021f. Focus mismatch under ellipsis in Japanese and its theoretical implications. Ms., Seisen University. [under the first round of reviews at Journal of East Asian Linguistics]
2021g. Lexical decomposition in syntax: New evidence from VP-ellipsis. Ms., Seisen University/University of Arizona, Tucson. [under the second round of reviews at Linguistic Inquiry; co-authored with Jianrong Yu] 
2021h. Argument ellipsis in Uzbek. Ms., Seisen University/Sogang University. [to be submitted to a Korean journal; co-authored with Michael Barrie] 